“The jury was entitled to find that Davenport had made all of the statements and documents described above over a long period of time; that he disparaged plaintiff’s military service, either directly for the inconvenience it caused, or indirectly by equating Navy service with homosexuality; and that he did so in a workplace that regarded homosexuality as shameful and as proof of lesser ability to perform the job,” the appeals court said.
NEW JERSEY LAW JOURNAL | NEWS
By Colleen Murphy | February 6, 2024
![No photo description available.](https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/426575773_916656753496888_2904417574542761202_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=3635dc&_nc_ohc=jqsjEjYA-0wAX_F4dKj&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=00_AfA3Q7XUd4ww69l8FWl3aklju10hLT6gSoYxtbm_NLIe1A&oe=65CAA094)
https://www.facebook.com/markcdewland/posts/pfbid0xsTUc4CrnK2tF5HSQzzDDhQ96EtkQfWhKKCQpgSJDZJkaRrFRqF61yDGn398c2qhl?__cft__[0]=AZVzl6wUt3kQw5AXcPAJ7mz1gcIOzbhAh8LYQiXc8sIE3fwg2mrLc4Dm3E3iPOMk_vqisDNd8-px8lE2NnFldLEcM8-Lft31eS5Tcd9NUuTbED3ywgZn1odAmcytYh6FzTc&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R