“The jury was entitled to find that Davenport had made all of the statements and documents described above over a long period of time; that he disparaged plaintiff’s military service, either directly for the inconvenience it caused, or indirectly by equating Navy service with homosexuality; and that he did so in a workplace that regarded homosexuality as shameful and as proof of lesser ability to perform the job,” the appeals court said.

NEW JERSEY LAW JOURNAL | NEWS
By Colleen Murphy | February 6, 2024
No photo description available.
https://www.facebook.com/markcdewland/posts/pfbid0xsTUc4CrnK2tF5HSQzzDDhQ96EtkQfWhKKCQpgSJDZJkaRrFRqF61yDGn398c2qhl?__cft__[0]=AZVzl6wUt3kQw5AXcPAJ7mz1gcIOzbhAh8LYQiXc8sIE3fwg2mrLc4Dm3E3iPOMk_vqisDNd8-px8lE2NnFldLEcM8-Lft31eS5Tcd9NUuTbED3ywgZn1odAmcytYh6FzTc&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R